Open AccessMedicine

M. Fedgchin, M. Trivedi, E. Daly, R. Melkote, R. Lane, P. Lim, D. Vitagliano, P. Blier, M. Fava, M. Liebowitz, A. Ravindran, R. Gaillard, H. Ameele, S. Preskorn, H. Manji, D. Hough, W. Drevets, Jaskaran Singh

2019.7.10INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY

DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyz039

Résumé tlooto

The treatment effect (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) for both esketamine/antidepressant groups exceeded what has been considered clinically meaningful for approved antidepressants vs placebo.

Résumé

Abstract Background About one-third of patients with depression fail to achieve remission despite treatment with multiple antidepressants and are considered to have treatment-resistant depression. Methods This Phase 3, double-blind, multicenter study enrolled adults with moderate-to-severe depression and nonresponse to ≥2 antidepressants in the current depression episode. Eligible patients (N = 346) were randomized (1:1:1) to twice-weekly nasal spray treatment (esketamine [56 or 84 mg] or placebo) plus a newly initiated, open-label, oral antidepressant taken daily for 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to day 28 in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale total score, performed by blinded, remote raters. Based on the predefined statistical testing sequence, esketamine 84 mg/antidepressant had to be significant for esketamine 56 mg/antidepressant to be formally tested. Results Statistical significance was not achieved with esketamine 84 mg/antidepressant compared with antidepressant/placebo (least squares [LS] means difference [95% CI]: –3.2 [–6.88, 0.45]; 2-sided P value = .088). Although esketamine 56 mg/antidepressant could not be formally tested, the LS means difference was –4.1 [–7.67, –0.49] (nominal 2-sided P value = .027). The most common (>20%) adverse events reported for esketamine/antidepressant were nausea, dissociation, dizziness, vertigo, and headache. Conclusions Statistical significance was not achieved for the primary endpoint; nevertheless, the treatment effect (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) for both esketamine/antidepressant groups exceeded what has been considered clinically meaningful for approved antidepressants vs placebo. Safety was similar between esketamine/antidepressant groups and no new dose-related safety concerns were identified. This study provides supportive evidence for the safety and efficacy of esketamine nasal spray as a new, rapid-acting antidepressant for patients with treatment-resistant depression. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02417064

Format de citation

FEDGCHIN, M., et al. Efficacy and safety of fixed-dose esketamine nasal spray combined with a new oral antidepressant in treatment-resistant depression: Results of a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study (TRANSFORM-1). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 22: 616–630.