Environmental ScienceBiologyPhilosophy
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-10991-2_8

tlooto Summary

This chapter defends and elaborate the claim that species are not good units of biodiversity, focusing in the issue of species realism, and sketches a pragmatic notion of ‘species’ that can be used as an epistemic tool in the context of biodiversity studies, without however involving a view of species as basic units of sustainability or as the focal, real entities in biodiversity conservation.

Abstract

While species have long been seen as the principal units of biodiversity, with prominent roles in biodiversity research and conservation practice, the long-standing debate on the nature of species deeply problematizes their suitability as such units. Not only do the metaphysical questions remain unresolved what kinds of things species are , and whether species are at all real, there also is considerable disagreement on how to define the notion of species for use in practice. Moreover, it seems that different organism groups are best classified using different definitions of ‘species’, such that species of organisms in very different domains of biodiversity are not generally comparable units. In this chapter I will defend and elaborate the claim that species are not good units of biodiversity, focusing in the issue of species realism. I will sketch a pragmatic notion of ‘species’ that can be used as an epistemic tool in the context of biodiversity studies, without however involving a view of species as basic units of biodiversity or as the focal, real entities in biodiversity conservation.

Citation format

REYDON, T. Are species good units for biodiversity studies and conservation efforts? History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences, 2019.