Michael Nair-Collins
2018.3.31Diametros
tlooto Summary
This special issue takes up Lizza's challenge regarding a biological concept of death, characterizing and justifying such a theory of biological death, and shows that patients who meet the diagnostic criteria for brain death are unequivocally biologically alive.
Abstract
John P. Lizza has long been a major figure in the scholarly literature on criteria for death. His searching and penetrating critiques of the dominant biological paradigm, and his defense of a theory of death of the person as a psychophysical entity, have both significantly advanced the literature. In this special issue, Lizza reinforces his critiques of a strictly biological approach. In my commentary, I take up Lizza’s challenge regarding a biological concept of death. He is certainly right to point out that science is not value-free; however, this does not imply that there cannot be a characterization of biological death that can be shown to be superior to other concepts. After characterizing and justifying such a theory of biological death, I show that patients who meet the diagnostic criteria for brain death are unequivocally biologically alive. However, with respect to concepts of personhood and related ideas (as opposed to biology), I urge the acceptance of a pluralism of such concepts for matters of public policy.
Citation format
NAIR-COLLINS, Michael. A biological theory of death: Characterization, justification, and implications. Diametros, 2018: 27–43.