C. Weible, P. Sabatier, K. McQueen
2009.2.1POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL
tlooto Summary
ACF analysis of 80 policy applications spanning 20 years shows its applicability to various topics and geographical areas, but questions remain about coalition stability and cross-coalition learning.
Abstract
A policy process framework that has been developed to simplify the complexity of public policy is the advocacy coalition framework (ACF). This essay reports on an analysis of 80 applications of the ACF spanning nearly 20 years. The review shows that the ACF is applicable to various substantive topics, across various geographical areas, and with other policy process theories and frameworks, including the stages heuristic. The most commonly tested hypotheses involve policy change, learning, and coalition stability. Although the hypotheses tend to be confirmed, questions remain about the membership, stability, and defection of coalition members; about the causal mechanisms linking external events and policy change; and about the conditions that facilitate cross-coalition learning. Emerging areas of research include policy subsystem interdependencies and coordination within, and between, coalitions.
Citation format
WEIBLE, C.; SABATIER, P.; MCQUEEN, K. Themes and variations: Taking stock of the advocacy coalition framework. POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2009, 37: 121–140.