A. Macintosh, A. Whyte
tlooto Summary
There is a need for coherent evaluation frameworks employing such perspectives and methods, the better to understand current eParticipation applications and learn from these experiences, it is argued.
Abstract
Purpose – The paper seeks to demonstrate the use of a range of perspectives and methods to evaluate eParticipation initiatives. It aims to argue that there is a need for coherent evaluation frameworks employing such perspectives and methods, the better to understand current eParticipation applications and learn from these experiences.Design/methodology/approach – A case study of eParticipation evaluation for four local authority led projects from the “top down” stream of the UK Local e‐Democracy National Project is presented.Findings – Applying the eParticipation framework resulted in an assessment that was considered fair by participants. However, the framework needs further development. More consideration needs to be placed on how and when to use tools in which contexts, also, on how to combine tools to enable inclusive engagement. The evaluation timescale meant important aspects of the framework were downplayed.Research limitations/implications – Further research is needed in two main areas; first, on ...
Citation format
MACINTOSH, A.; WHYTE, A. Towards an evaluation framework for eparticipation. Transforming Government- People Process and Policy, 2008, 2: 16–30.