Open AccessPolitical ScienceSociology
DOI: 10.18352/erlacs.9229

Abstract

The regimes of Hugo Chavez, Evo Morales, and Rafael Correa undermine contestation while simultaneously increasing the material inclusion of the poor and the excluded. These regimes that are usually lumped together show distinct patterns in fostering participation. Whereas in Ecuador participation is reduced to voting in elections, participatory institutions were created in Venezuela and Bolivia. And whereas mobilization in Bolivia comes mostly from the bottom up, in Venezuela and Ecuador it comes from the top-down. To compare their divergent patterns this paper analyses: 1) the strength of subaltern organizations when these leaders were elected; 2) the confrontation between governments and the oppositions; and 3) the views of democratization of the coalitions that brought these regimes to power.

Citation format

TORRE, C. D. In the name of the people: Democratization, popular organizations, and populism in venezuela, bolivia, and ecuador. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 2013: 27–48.