PhilosophySociology
DOI: 10.1177/000842987500400311

tlooto Summary

Ahlstrom's book review fails to propose a new historical interpretation of the 1960s, instead offering an old view with minor adjustments.

Abstract

introduction Ahlstrom states that events of the sixties have driven us to ’an awareness of historiographical crisis’ and that ’events have so radically transformed the American situation that our whole view of what is relevant in the past must be revised’ (12). This sweeping statement would seem to promise a new historical interpretation based upon a periodization determined by the decisive significance of the decade of the sixties. What are we to say to this? The new historical interpretation is simply not forthcoming. Ahlstrom’s volume does not mark a new interpretation of the past but the best of the old. As regards the sixties being a decisive turning point, Ahlstrom is fully aware that ’the historian who describes his own times as the end of an epoch makes a

Citation format

RAMBERAN, O. G. Compte rendu / review of book: Philosophy of religion, second edition JOHN h. HICK englewood cliffs, NJ: Prentice-hall 1973. ix, 133. $3.15. STUDIES IN RELIGION-SCIENCES RELIGIEUSES, 1974, 4: 287–289.