Open AccessPhilosophy

Ben Turner

2016.10.31Derrida Today

DOI: 10.3366/drt.2016.0132

tlooto Summary

Stiegler's philosophy re-articulates Derridean differance to define human existence through technical supplements, challenging criticisms of metaphysics and humanism.

Abstract

Through a re-articulation of Derridean differance, Bernard Stiegler claims that the human is defined by an originary default that displaces all psychic and social life onto technical supplements. His philosophy of technics re-articulates the logic of the supplement as concerning both human reflexivity and its supports, and the history of the differance of life itself. This has been criticised for reducing Derrida's work to a metaphysics of presence, and for instituting a humanism of the relation to the inorganic. By refuting these claims, this article will show that Stiegler's doubling of differance enables him to articulate the human as constituted by both the individuation characteristic of ‘life’, and that of a technical, psychic, and collective individuation. Putting forward a reading of the logic of the trace in life, and emphasising the aspects of Leroi-Gourhan, Simondon, and Canguilhem that Stiegler uses in his reading of Derrida, I will demonstrate that the political stakes of adaption and adoptio...

Citation format

TURNER, Ben. Life and the technical transformation of différance: Stiegler and the noopolitics of becoming non-inhuman. Derrida Today, 2016, 9: 177–198.