DOI: 10.9739/tjvs.2019.237

tlooto Summary

It is shown that the restenosis rate is similar using both closure techniques in patients undergoing CEA, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two surgical closure techniques during midterm follow-up.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to compare midterm results of patch angioplasty with primary closure techniques in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in terms of restenosis. Patients and methods: This prospective, single-center, randomized study included a total of 137 patients (42 females, 95 males; mean age 64.4±8.8 years; range 36 to 86 years) who underwent CEA between January 2010 and October 2015. The patients were divided into two groups: the patch angioplasty group (n=70) and the primary closure group (n=67). The mean follow-up was 2-7 years. Carotid computed tomography angiography was performed to evaluate restenosis. Restenosis was defined as a lesion of >70% in diameter. Results: During midterm follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in the restenosis rate between the two surgical closure techniques (p=0.729). Conclusion: Our study results show that the restenosis rate is similar using both closure techniques in patients undergoing CEA.

Citation format

İYIGÜN, T. Our midterm restenosis results using patch angioplasty closure versus primary closure in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: A comparative study. Turkish Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2019.