EducationPsychologyComputer Science

D. McNamara, W. Kintsch

1996.10.1DISCOURSE PROCESSES

DOI: 10.1080/01638539609544975

tlooto Summary

Two experiments, theoretically motivated by the construction‐integration model of comprehension, investigated effects of prior knowledge on learning from high‐ and low‐coherence history texts and indicated that the low‐ coherence text requires more inference processes.

Abstract

Two experiments, theoretically motivated by the construction‐integration model of comprehension (W. Kintsch, 1988), investigated effects of prior knowledge on learning from high‐ and low‐coherence history texts. In Experiment 1, participants’ comprehension was examined through free recall, multiple‐choice questions, and a keyword sorting task. An advantage was found for the high‐coherence text on recall and multiple‐choice questions. However, high‐knowledge readers performed better on the sorting task after reading the low‐coherence text. In Experiment 2, participants’ comprehension was examined through open‐ended questions and the sorting task both immediately and after a 1‐week delay. Little effect of delay was found, and the previous sorting task results failed to replicate. As predicted, high‐knowledge readers performed better on the open‐ended questions after reading the low‐coherence text. Reading times from both experiments indicated that the low‐coherence text requires more inference processes. Th...

Citation format

MCNAMARA, D.; KINTSCH, W. Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. DISCOURSE PROCESSES, 1996, 22: 247–288.