Political Science

K. Deegan‐Krause, T. Haughton

2009.8.1Politics & Policy

DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-1346.2009.00200.x

tlooto Summary

This 2009 study redefines populism as a description of party appeals, identifying two types and degrees of populist appeals in Slovakia, offering clues to their origination and longevity.

Abstract

Shifting our understanding of populism from a question of core identity to a description of party appeals allows for a neutralization of the term’s negative connotations by allowing that all parties may use populist appeals to some extent. It is then possible to address a party’s use of populist appeals by measuring its distinctly nonpopulist appeals, which are usually less bound up with normative judgments. Although the preliminary analysis of Slovakia shows a relatively close empirical fit among the theoretical elements in the existing literature, two categories of populist appeals are identified: the outward-looking appeals that vary strongly with a party’s relationship to power, and inward-looking appeals that remain more stable over time. Use of these by politicians may offer clues to the origination, attractiveness, and longevity of populist and nonpopulist appeals.

Citation format

DEEGAN‐KRAUSE, K.; HAUGHTON, T. Toward a more useful conceptualization of populism: Types and degrees of populist appeals in the case of slovakia. Politics & Policy, 2009, 37: 821–841.