Open AccessEducationComputer Science

Carsten Q. Schneider, Claudius Wagemann

2010COMPARATIVE SOCIOLOGY

DOI: 10.1163/156913210x12493538729793

tlooto Summary

A list from A to Z of twenty-six proposals regarding what a “good” QCAbased research entails, both with regard to QCA as a research approach and as an analytical technique are presented.

Abstract

As a relatively new methodological tool, QCA is still a work in progress. Standards of good practice are needed in order to enhance the quality of its applications. We present a list from A to Z of twenty-six proposals regarding what a “good” QCA-based research entails, both with regard to QCA as a research approach and as an analytical technique. Our suggestions are subdivided into three categories: criteria referring to the research stages before, during, and after the analytical moment of data analysis. This listing can be read as a guideline for authors, reviewers, and readers of QCA.

Citation format

SCHNEIDER, Carsten Q.; WAGEMANN, Claudius. Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets. COMPARATIVE SOCIOLOGY, 2010, 9: 397–418.