Open AccessSociologyPsychology

Karen M. Douglas, J. Uscinski, Robbie M. Sutton, A. Cichocka, T. Nefes, C. Ang, F. Deravi

2019.3.20POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY

DOI: 10.1111/pops.12568

tlooto Summary

This 2019 review article explores conspiracy theories' psychological, political, and social factors, their communication methods, risks, and rewards, concluding that they cause more harm than good.

Abstract

Scholarly efforts to understand conspiracy theories have grown significantly in recent years, and there is now a broad and interdisciplinary literature that we review in this article. We ask three specific questions. First, what are the factors that are associated with conspiracy theorizing? Our review of the literature shows that conspiracy beliefs result from a range of psychological, political and social factors. Next, how are conspiracy theories communicated? Here, we explain how conspiracy theories are shared among individuals and spread through traditional and social media platforms. Next, what are the risks and rewards associated with conspiracy theories? By focusing on politics and science, we argue that conspiracy theories do more harm than good. Finally, because this is a growing literature and many open questions remain, we conclude by suggesting several promising avenues for future research.

Citation format

DOUGLAS, Karen M., et al. Understanding conspiracy theories. POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019.