Victoria Williams, Daniel R. Unger, D. Kulhavy, I. Hung, Yanli Zhang

2023.7.31International Journal of Geospatial and Environmental Research

DOI: 10.58997/gnar6813

tlooto Summary

Results indicate that when a drone is flown in a double grid pattern Pix4Dmapper will produce a complete orthophoto mosaic, even over homogenous areas like a small lake, when compared to Drone2Map.

Abstract

This study evaluated two popular software packages currently used within the natural resources profession to create orthophoto mosaics: Drone2Map and Pix4Dmapper. Of particular concern was how effective these two software packages would perform in creating orthophoto mosaics over a city park in East Texas consisting of forest, open grass, and urban concrete surrounding a lake. Two drone flights over the city park were conducted. One flight was at 76 meters (250 feet) above ground with a single pass configuration. The other flight was at 122 meters (400 feet) above ground with a double pass configuration. Upon the completion of each drone flight, two orthophoto mosaics were created for each flight using all images acquired per flight with Drone2Map and Pix4Dmapper software. For the single pass configuration Drone2Map failed to complete a basic orthophoto mosaic.

Citation format

WILLIAMS, Victoria, et al. Comparing drone2map versus pix4dmapper when creating orthophoto mosaics over homogeneous land features. International Journal of Geospatial and Environmental Research, 2023.