Open Access

Dds MARCO ESPOSITO, Dds MSc GEORGE PAPAVASILIOU, MD MARZENA DOMINIAK, Dds ERTA XHANARI, Dds JACOPO BUTI, MPerio RCSEd PhD, Dds FRIEDHELM HEINEMANN, B. Grufferty

2024.1.1Clinical Trials in Dentistry

DOI: 10.36130/ctd.04.2023.02

tlooto Summary

To compare the clinical outcomes of dental implants restored with definitive occluding partial fixed prostheses within one week after implant placement versus immediate loading with non-occluding provisional restorations replaced by definitive pro-stheses after four months, forty partially edentulous patients with one to three dental implants are treated.

Abstract

PURPOSE. To compare the clinical outcomes of dental implants restored with definitive occluding partial fixed prostheses within one week after implant placement versus immediate loading with non-occluding provisional restorations replaced by definitive pro-stheses after four months. MATERIALS AND METHODS . Forty partially edentulous patients treated with one to three dental implants, of length at least 8

Citation format

ESPOSITO, Dds MARCO, et al. IMMEDIATE LOADING OF OCCLUDING DEFINITIVE PARTIAL FIXED PROSTHESES VERSUS NONOCCLUDING PROVISIONAL PROSTHESES: 10-YEAR POST-LOADING RESULTS FROM a MULTICENTRE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL. Clinical Trials in Dentistry, 2024.