Open AccessComputer Science

Yifan Wang, Weizhi Ma, Min Zhang, Yiqun Liu, Shaoping Ma

2022.6.8ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS

DOI: 10.1145/3547333

tlooto Summary

This survey reviews over 60 papers published in top conferences/journals and provides an elaborate taxonomy of fairness methods in the recommendation, and outlines some promising future directions on fairness in recommendation.

Abstract

Recommender systems are an essential tool to relieve the information overload challenge and play an important role in people’s daily lives. Since recommendations involve allocations of social resources (e.g., job recommendation), an important issue is whether recommendations are fair. Unfair recommendations are not only unethical but also harm the long-term interests of the recommender system itself. As a result, fairness issues in recommender systems have recently attracted increasing attention. However, due to multiple complex resource allocation processes and various fairness definitions, the research on fairness in recommendation is scattered. To fill this gap, we review over 60 papers published in top conferences/journals, including TOIS, SIGIR, and WWW. First, we summarize fairness definitions in the recommendation and provide several views to classify fairness issues. Then, we review recommendation datasets and measurements in fairness studies and provide an elaborate taxonomy of fairness methods in the recommendation. Finally, we conclude this survey by outlining some promising future directions.

Citation format

WANG, Yifan, et al. A survey on the fairness of recommender systems [preprint]. arXiv, 2022. arXiv:2206.03761.