MedicineEngineering

A. Antal, B. Luber, A. Brem, M. Bikson, A. Brunoni, R. Cohen Kadosh, Veljko Dubljević, S. Fecteau, F. Ferreri, A. Flöel, M. Hallett, R. Hamilton, C. Herrmann, M. Lavidor, Collen Loo, C. Lustenberger, Sergio Machado, C. Miniussi, V. Moliadze, M. Nitsche, S. Rossi, P. Rossini, E. Santarnecchi, M. Seeck, G. Thut, Z. Turi, Y. Ugawa, G. Venkatasubramanian, N. Wenderoth, Anna Wexler, U. Ziemann, W. Paulus

2022.5.1Clinical Neurophysiology Practice

DOI: 10.1016/j.cnp.2022.05.002

tlooto Summary

The available data frame with a wide parameter space of tES does not allow an overarching protocol recommendation, and consensus among experts is that tES for neuroenhancement is safe as long as tested protocols are followed.

Abstract

Highlights • The available data frame with a wide parameter space of tES does not allow an overarching protocol recommendation.• Established engineering risk-management procedures with regard to manufacturing should be followed.• Consensus among experts is that tES for neuroenhancement is safe as long as tested protocols are followed.

Citation format

ANTAL, A., et al. Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement. Clinical Neurophysiology Practice, 2022, 7: 146–165.