S. Colombo, A. Mazza, F. Montagna, R. Ricci, O. Dal Monte, M. Cantamessa
2020.5.1Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference
tlooto Summary
EEG and eye-tracking evidence confirms the findings coherently to the literature and indicates that neurophysiological results in idea generation differ between designers and engineers.
Abstract
Abstract The paper describes the rigorous implementation of a validated methodological experimental protocol to divergent and convergent thinking tasks occurring in Design by neurophysiological means (EEG and eye-tracking). EEG evidence confirms the findings coherently to the literature. Interesting is the confirmation of such results through eye-tracking ones, and further evidence emerged. In particular, neurophysiological results in idea generation differ between designers and engineers. This study was supported by a multidisciplinary team, both for the neuropsychological and data analysis aspects.
Citation format
COLOMBO, S., et al. NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE IN IDEA GENERATION: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DESIGNERS AND ENGINEERS. Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, 2020, 1: 1415–1424.