Political ScienceEconomicsPhilosophy

Till Düppe, Sarah Joly-Simard

2020.7.10Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology

DOI: 10.1108/s0743-41542020000038b003

tlooto Summary

Stalin's anti-dogmatism masked his tyranny by diverting attention, establishing personal authority, and creating conflicts that excluded opponents.

Abstract

When Stalin, in 1936, declared socialism achieved in the Soviet Union, he opened the door for the codification of the political economy of socialism beyond Marx’s political economy of capitalism. Indeed, at the same time as he executed the tyrannical policies he is known for, he led a series of private conversations with economists about a textbook on the political economy of socialism that spanned nearly 20 years. In these conversations, Stalin repeatedly argued for an open debate and against dogmatism. Most notably, he accepted the existence of the so-called law of value in socialism, which appears to subject the state to scientific authority. Reconstructing these conversations, we show that his claim to a pluralist scientific debate helped paper over his tyranny, first by diverting attention from the real issues, second by establishing his personal authority as an intellectual, and third by creating conflicts that would exclude his opponents.

Citation format

DÜPPE, Till; JOLY-SIMARD, Sarah. Stalin’s pluralism: How anti-dogmatism serves tyranny. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 2020.