Psychology

A. Rush, M. Trivedi, S. Wisniewski, A. Nierenberg, J. Stewart, D. Warden, G. Niederehe, M. Thase, P. Lavori, B. Lebowitz, P. McGrath, J. Rosenbaum, H. Sackeim, D. Kupfer, J. Luther, M. Fava

2006.11.1AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY

DOI: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1905

tlooto Summary

The acute and longer-term treatment outcomes associated with each of four successive steps in the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial are described and compared.

Abstract

Objective: This report describes the participants and compares the acute and longer-term treatment outcomes associated with each of four successive steps in the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial. Method: A broadly representative adult outpatient sample with nonpsychotic major depressive disorder received one (N=3,671) to four (N=123) successive acute treatment steps. Those not achieving remission with or unable to tolerate a treatment step were encouraged to move to the next step. Those with an acceptable benefit, preferably symptom remission, from any particular step could enter a 12-month naturalistic follow-up phase. A score of ≤5 on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology–Self-Report (QIDS-SR 16 ) (equivalent to ≤7 on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HRSD 17 ]) defined remission; a QIDS-SR 16 total score of ≥11 (HRSD 17 ≥14) defined relapse. Results: The QIDS-SR 16 remission rates were 36.8%, 30.6%, 13.7%, and 13.0% for the first, second, t...

Citation format

RUSH, A., et al. Acute and longer- term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: A STAR*D report. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 163: 1905–1917.