A. Rush, M. Trivedi, S. Wisniewski, A. Nierenberg, J. Stewart, D. Warden, G. Niederehe, M. Thase, P. Lavori, B. Lebowitz, P. McGrath, J. Rosenbaum, H. Sackeim, D. Kupfer, J. Luther, M. Fava
2006.11.1AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
tlooto Summary
The acute and longer-term treatment outcomes associated with each of four successive steps in the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial are described and compared.
Abstract
Objective: This report describes the participants and compares the acute and longer-term treatment outcomes associated with each of four successive steps in the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial. Method: A broadly representative adult outpatient sample with nonpsychotic major depressive disorder received one (N=3,671) to four (N=123) successive acute treatment steps. Those not achieving remission with or unable to tolerate a treatment step were encouraged to move to the next step. Those with an acceptable benefit, preferably symptom remission, from any particular step could enter a 12-month naturalistic follow-up phase. A score of ≤5 on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology–Self-Report (QIDS-SR 16 ) (equivalent to ≤7 on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HRSD 17 ]) defined remission; a QIDS-SR 16 total score of ≥11 (HRSD 17 ≥14) defined relapse. Results: The QIDS-SR 16 remission rates were 36.8%, 30.6%, 13.7%, and 13.0% for the first, second, t...
Citation format
RUSH, A., et al. Acute and longer- term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: A STAR*D report. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 163: 1905–1917.