Environmental ScienceMedicine

S. Leary, W. Underwood, R. Anthony, Samuel Cartner, D. Corey, T. Grandin, Cheryl B. Greenacre, Sharon Gwaltney-Bran, M. A. McCrackin, Robert E. Meyer, David Miller, J. Shearer, R. Yanong

2013.8.1ANIMAL WELFARE

DOI: 10.1017/s0962728600005492

tlooto Summary

Although complete absence of pain and distress is preferred, it is understood that it cannot always be achieved and neither slaughter nor humane killing is covered in the document P.1.1.68, S6.2.13.

Abstract

1. Clarification: The 2013 Guidelines make a distinction between euthanasia, humane killing, and slaughter, and state that neither slaughter nor humane killing is covered in the document P.68, S6.1.1. Not included among the definitions of these terms are ending the lives of healthy animals or scientific collection of animals. For clarification, whatever the term used, classification of the method, or reason given for killing animals: euthanasia, humane killing, slaughter, harvest, depopulation, scientific collection, or research-related, the Council on Accreditation’s foremost concern, in all situations, is with humane technique. The goal of humane technique is to minimize pain, distress, and the negative effect to the animal. The technique employed should result in rapid loss of consciousness followed by cardiac or respiratory arrest and, ultimately, a loss of brain function. Although complete absence of pain and distress is preferred, it is understood that it cannot always be achieved P7.13.2.

Citation format

LEARY, S., et al. AVMA guidelines for the euthanasia of animals. ANIMAL WELFARE, 2013.